Conrad v. Moore

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Conrad v. Moore

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6870

JON TERENCE YAHCHANAN CONRAD, a/k/a Jon Terence Conrad,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL MOORE, Director of SCDC; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-98-2753-AJ)

Submitted: November 4, 1999 Decided: November 9, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jon Terence Yahchanan Conrad, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Eugene Bogan, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Jon Terence Yahchanan Conrad seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommen-

dation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Conrad v.

Moore, No. CA-98-2753-AJ (D.S.C. May 24, 1999). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished