Alton v. Sizer

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Alton v. Sizer

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6718

WILLIAM E. ALTON, III,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

F. C. SIZER, JR.; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-3276-AW)

Submitted: October 26, 1999 Decided: November 19, 1999

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William E. Alton, III, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant William E. Alton, III, seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district

court. See Alton v. Sizer, No. CA-98-3276-AW (D. Md. May 4, 1999). We note that Alton’s claims that counsel failed to obtain critical

evidence of prosecutorial misconduct and failed to exercise Alton’s

right to compulsory process are not cognizable because Alton failed to exhaust these claims in state court proceedings. See

28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(b)(1)(A). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished