Hoyte v. McFarlin
Hoyte v. McFarlin
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6701
ALBERT WILLIAMS HOYTE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SHERIFF MCFARLIN; GORDON B. JENKINSON, a/k/a Bubba; DUANE SHULER, Assistant Solicitor; ELEANOR BELTON-SAVAGE, Officer; DAVID F. MCINNIS, Judge; LEGRANDE CARRAWAY, Public De- fender of Williamsburg County; WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY; RANDY GRAYSON, Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-885-2-17AJ)
Submitted: September 28, 1999 Decided: November 24, 1999
Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Albert Williams Hoyte, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Coleman Jones, Christy Scott Stephens, BOGOSLOW & JONES, Walterboro, South Caro- lina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Albert Williams Hoyte appeals the district court’s orders de-
nying relief on his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 1999) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Hoyte v. McFarlin, No. CA-97-885-2-17AJ
(D.S.C. July 16, 1997; Mar. 12, 1999). We dispense with oral argu-
ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre-
sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished