U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Hoyte v. McFarlin

Hoyte v. McFarlin
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 24, 1999

Hoyte v. McFarlin

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6701

ALBERT WILLIAMS HOYTE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

SHERIFF MCFARLIN; GORDON B. JENKINSON, a/k/a Bubba; DUANE SHULER, Assistant Solicitor; ELEANOR BELTON-SAVAGE, Officer; DAVID F.

MCINNIS, Judge; LEGRANDE CARRAWAY, Public De- fender of Williamsburg County; WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY; RANDY GRAYSON, Officer, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-885-2-17AJ)

Submitted: September 28, 1999 Decided: November 24, 1999

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Albert Williams Hoyte, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Coleman Jones, Christy Scott Stephens, BOGOSLOW & JONES, Walterboro, South Caro- lina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Albert Williams Hoyte appeals the district court’s orders de- nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hoyte v. McFarlin, No. CA-97-885-2-17AJ (D.S.C. July 16, 1997; Mar. 12, 1999). We dispense with oral argu- ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre- sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.