United States v. Blango

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Blango

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6907

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ELBERT BLANGO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CR-95-350-A)

Submitted: November 18, 1999 Decided: November 23, 1999

Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elbert Blango, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Elbert Blango appeals the district court's order denying his

motion for relief from judgment, sentence or order. We have re-

viewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Blango, No. CR-95-350-A (E.D.

Va. Jan. 27, 1999).* We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the district court's order is marked as "filed" on January 26, 1999, the district court's records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on January 27, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court's decision. See Wilson v. Murray,

806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35

(4th Cir. 1986).

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished