United States v. Blango
United States v. Blango
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6907
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ELBERT BLANGO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CR-95-350-A)
Submitted: November 18, 1999 Decided: November 23, 1999
Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elbert Blango, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Elbert Blango appeals the district court's order denying his
motion for relief from judgment, sentence or order. We have re-
viewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See United States v. Blango, No. CR-95-350-A (E.D.
Va. Jan. 27, 1999).* We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
* Although the district court's order is marked as "filed" on January 26, 1999, the district court's records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on January 27, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court's decision. See Wilson v. Murray,
806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35(4th Cir. 1986).
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished