Ross v. Baker

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Ross v. Baker

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6934

JAMES THEODORE ROSS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RICHARD BAKER, Superintendent; TAMMY HALL, Classification Counselor,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 99-1690-DKC)

Submitted: November 18, 1999 Decided: November 23, 1999

Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Theodore Ross, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

James Theodore Ross appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 1998) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Ross v. Baker, No. CA-99-1690-DKC (D. Md.

June 30, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished