Flynn v. Natl Electronics
Flynn v. Natl Electronics
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1952
DOUGLAS L. FLYNN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
NATIONAL ELECTRONICS WARRANTY CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-1363-A)
Submitted: November 18, 1999 Decided: November 23, 1999
Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Douglas L. Flynn, Appellant Pro Se. Brian S. Harvey, Barbra Marcus Kolton, BAKER & HOSTETLER, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Douglas L. Flynn appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendant in his employment dis- crimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny his motion for appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Flynn v. National Electronics Warranty Corp., No. CA-98-1363-A (E.D. Va. June 9, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.