Rogers v. NC Attorney General

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Rogers v. NC Attorney General

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6838

JAMES C. ROGERS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; TED SMILEY, Superintendent, Warren Correctional Center,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-970-1)

Submitted: November 23, 1999 Decided: December 17, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James C. Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 &

Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court. See Rogers v. North Carolina Att’y Gen., No. CA-98-

970-1 (M.D.N.C. May 17, 1999). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished