Joyce v. Fieldcrest Cannon
Joyce v. Fieldcrest Cannon
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2273
BERTHA M. JOYCE; NANCY W. MANNS,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
FIELDCREST CANNON, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-57-4)
Submitted: November 9, 1999 Decided: December 15, 1999
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bertha M. Joyce, Nancy W. Manns, Appellants Pro Se. Julianna Cochran Theall, SMITH, HELMS, MULLISS & MOORE, L.L.P., Greensboro, North Carolina; James A.L. Daniel, DANIEL, VAUGHAN, MEDLEY & SMITHERMAN, P.C., Danville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Bertha M. Joyce and Nancy W. Manns appeal the district court’s
order granting summary judgment to Fieldcrest Cannon, Incorporated,
and dismissing their employment discrimination complaint. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Joyce v. Fieldcrest Cannon, Inc., No.
CA-96-57-4 (W.D. Va. Aug. 12, 1999). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished