United States v. Palacio

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Palacio

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7379

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RODNEY ROGERS PALACIO, a/k/a L.L.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CR-97-262, CA-99-135-3)

Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 22, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodney Rogers Palacio, Appellant Pro Se. James Brien Comey, Jr., John Staige Davis, V, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Rich- mond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Rodney Rogers Palacio seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West Supp.

1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certifi-

cate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Palacio, Nos. CR-97-262;

CA-99-135-3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 12, 1999). We dispense with oral argu-

ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished