United States v. Palacio
United States v. Palacio
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7379
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RODNEY ROGERS PALACIO, a/k/a L.L.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CR-97-262, CA-99-135-3)
Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 22, 1999
Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodney Rogers Palacio, Appellant Pro Se. James Brien Comey, Jr., John Staige Davis, V, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Rich- mond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Rodney Rogers Palacio seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West Supp.
1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certifi-
cate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of
the district court. See United States v. Palacio, Nos. CR-97-262;
CA-99-135-3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 12, 1999). We dispense with oral argu-
ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished