U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Palacio

United States v. Palacio
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 22, 1999

United States v. Palacio

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7379

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

RODNEY ROGERS PALACIO, a/k/a L.L., Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CR-97-262, CA-99-135-3)

Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 22, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodney Rogers Palacio, Appellant Pro Se. James Brien Comey, Jr., John Staige Davis, V, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Rich- mond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Rodney Rogers Palacio seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certifi- cate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Palacio, Nos. CR-97-262; CA-99-135-3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 12, 1999). We dispense with oral argu- ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.