U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Mitchell v. Elswick

Mitchell v. Elswick
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 21, 1999

Mitchell v. Elswick

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7053

WALLACE MITCHELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

Y. ELSWICK; E. C. MORRIS; MORTON GILBERT, SR.; KEVIN ROBINSON, Officer, Red Onion State Prison; K. BARNES; DWAYNE HOPKINS; CALVIN B.

WILLIAMS; LIEUTENANT BENNETT; CAPTAIN PEREZ; ROBERT FULTON; JAMES MURPHY; EDMUND P. WALSH; GLORIA J. NELSON; CHARLES FRANCIS, St./Red Onion State Prison; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; LYNN REYNOLDS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-46-7)

Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 21, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wallace Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Wallace Mitchell appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the rec- ord and the district court’s memorandum opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mitchell v. Elswick, No. CA-99-46-7 (W.D. Va. May 21 & July 19, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.