UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6483

CHARLES RICHARD RILEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

A. D. MATHEWS, SR., Sheriff; EARL MULLINS, Internal Affairs; NANCY JUSTICE, Classifica- tion; TROY FISHER, Deputy Sheriff; W. LAS- SITER, Classification; ELLEN HOLT, Lieutenant; DEPUTY SHERIFF JESSIE; DEPUTY SHERIFF TABB; B. MALLORY, Deputy Sheriff; DEPUTY SHERIFF COLEY; RONALD REDFORD, Deputy Sheriff; DEPUTY SHERIFF HURT; UNKNOWN DEPUTIES, Deputy Sheriff; UN- KNOWN MEDICAL PERSONNEL, Jail Medical; UNKNOWN CLASSIFICATION PERSONNEL, Classification,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Barry R. Poretz, Magistrate Judge. (CA-98-94-AM)

Submitted: October 29, 1999 Decided: December 20, 1999

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Richard Riley, Appellant Pro Se. William Kerfoot Lewis, BEALE, BALFOUR, DAVIDSON, ETHERINGTON & PARKER, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Charles Richard Riley appeals the magistrate judge’s order de-

nying relief on his

(West Supp. 1999) complaint

after a trial.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate

judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Riley v.

Mathews, No. CA-98-94-AM (E.D. Va. Mar. 26, 1999). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge over this civil action. See

(c) (1994).

2