Glenn v. Shinault

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Glenn v. Shinault

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7039

ALBERT GLENN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

G. SHINAULT, Assistant Warden; D. PAYNE, Major,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

ADMINISTRATOR, Keen Mountain Correctional Center,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-98-593-7)

Submitted: December 7, 1999 Decided: December 20, 1999

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Albert Glenn, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Albert Glenn appeals the district court’s order granting sum-

mary judgment in favor of the Appellees and denying relief on his

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court, see Glenn v. Shinault, No. CA-98-593-7 (W.D. Va. July 23,

1999), and deny Glenn’s motion for appointment of counsel. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished