U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Peay

United States v. Peay
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 30, 1999

United States v. Peay

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7519

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

LINDA MITCHELL PEAY, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CR-90-89-G, CR-90-109-WS)

Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 30, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Linda Mitchell Peay, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Linda Mitchell Peay appeals the district court’s order dis- missing her motion for reduction of her term of imprisonment pur- suant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West Supp. 1999). We have re- viewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no re- versible error. Accordingly, we deny Peay’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Peay, Nos. CR-90-89-G; CR-90-109-01-WS (M.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.