U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Stone v. Beasley

Stone v. Beasley
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 30, 1999

Stone v. Beasley

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7284

ALLEN F. STONE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

DAVID BEASLEY, Governor of South Carolina; MICHAEL MOORE, Director of South Carolina De- partment of Corrections; LAURIE F. BESSINGER, Warden of Kirkland Correctional Institution; RONALD AGNEW, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. C. Weston Houck, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-2314-12-BD)

Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 30, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Allen F. Stone, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Harry McDonald, ROBIN- SON, MCFADDEN & MOORE, P.C., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Allen F. Stone appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. See Stone v. Beasley, No. CA-98-2314-12-BD (D.S.C. Aug. 31, 1999). We modify the district court’s order, however, to reflect that the dismissal as to defendant Ronald Agnew is without prejudice to Stone’s right to refile his claim against Agnew with proper service. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.