U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Padgett v. Moore

Padgett v. Moore
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 30, 1999

Padgett v. Moore

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7270

JAMES L. PADGETT, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

MICHAEL MOORE, Director of South Carolina De- partment of Corrections; DEBORAH FORD, Direc- tor of Laboratory Services, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. C. Weston Houck, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-2955-6-12)

Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 30, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James L. Padgett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Foster McLeod, HARRIS & MCLEOD, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: James L. Padgett, Jr., appeals the district court’s order de- nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no re- versible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Padgett v. Moore, No. CA-98-2955-6-12 (D.S.C. Aug. 31, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.