U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Derrick A. Johnson

United States v. Derrick A. Johnson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 29, 1999

United States v. Derrick A. Johnson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7079

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

DERRICK ANTHONY JOHNSON, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-95-17)

Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 29, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derrick Anthony Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Derrick Anthony Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Johnson, No. CR-95-17 (W.D. Va. July 15, 1999).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.