Affirmed by published per curiam opinion.

OPINION

The National Association of State Credit Union Supervisors and the States of Kansas and North Carolina at the relation of their administrators charged with regulating state-chartered credit unions in their respective States ** (the States), appeal a decision of the district court of the Eastern District of Virginia denying their challenge to regulations promulgated by the National Credit Union Administration (the Administration) and granting its motion for summary judgment. The Final Rule, 59 Fed.Reg. 59,357 (Nov. 17, 1994), modifies 12 C.F.R. Part 704 which regulates, among other things, the governance, election procedures, field of membership, and admission of members of state-chartered corporate credit unions.

The States contended that the Administration exceeded its power granted by Congress by applying the regulation to state-chartered credit unions; and violated the Administrative Procedure Act by failing to justify its decision to preempt state law and regulations. The district court considered both claims and found that Congress provided the Administration with the power to issue the regulations at issue. The court also found that the regulations were rationally related to the agency’s statutory purpose and that the Administration sufficiently articulated the reasons for the new regulations.

On appeal the States again contend that the final rule is invalid because it exceeds the power Congress granted to the Administration and because the Administration failed to justify its decision to preempt the regulatory authority of state supervisors over state-chartered corporate credit unions.

*230 We are of opinion these claims are without merit and we affirm the judgment of the district court on the written opinion of Judge Hilton, Credit Union National Association v. National Credit Union Administration, 57 F.Supp.2d 294 (E.D.Va. 1995), which we adopt as our own.

AFFIRMED.