U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Singleton

United States v. Singleton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 7, 1999

United States v. Singleton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7361

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

FREDERICK KEITH SINGLETON, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-95-179-A)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 7, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frederick Keith Singleton, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Clifford Chesnut, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Singleton appeals the district court’s order denying his Rule 41(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s finding that Singleton did not lawfully possess the $8,400 and the finding that Dunbar Armored, Inc. was entitled to the money. See United States v. Singleton, No. CR-95-179-A (E.D. Va. Sept. 1, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.