U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Conard

United States v. Conard
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 7, 1999

United States v. Conard

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7323

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

JIMMY EARL CONARD, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CR-91-52, CA-96-305-1-MU)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 7, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Earl Conard, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah Ann Ausburn, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Jimmy Earl Conard seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Conard, Nos. CR-91-52; CA-96-305-1-MU (W.D.N.C. July 30, 1998). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.