Harris v. Easley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Harris v. Easley

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7084

STEPHEN DURAND HARRIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL EASLEY,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-927-5-BO)

Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: January 7, 1999

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen Durand Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his petition filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp.

1998) and the order denying his motion for reconsideration. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Harris v. Easley, No. CA-97-927-5-BO

(E.D.N.C. June 1 & July 8, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished