United States v. Gravely
United States v. Gravely
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7113
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
MARY ELLEN GRAVELY, Defendant - Appellant.
No. 98-7131
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
JETAUN O. GRAVELY, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-27-R, CA-98-348-R, CA-98-347-R)
Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 6, 1999 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mary Ellen Gravely, Jetaun O. Gravely, Appellants Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Vir- ginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellants seek to appeal the district court’s orders denying their motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the records and the district court’s opin- ions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif- icate of appealability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. Gravely v. United States, Nos. CR-95-27-R; CA- 98-348-R; CA-98-347-R (W.D. Va. May 28, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.