Smith v. Angelone

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Smith v. Angelone

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7091

MICHAEL SEWELL SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections; E. MONTGOMERY TUCKER, Chairman of the Virginia Parole Board; LAUREL A. CORNER, Head of the Virginia Depart- ment of Corrections Court and Legal Unit; JOHN B. METZGER, III, former Chairman of the Vir- ginia Parole Board; GARY L. BASS, Manager of the Virginia Department of Corrections’ Clas- sification and Records Unit,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-229-2)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 6, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Sewell Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Lance Bradford Leggitt, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Michael Sewell Smith appeals the district court’s order deny-

ing relief on his

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 1998) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See Smith v. Angelone, No. CA-97-229-2 (E.D.

Va. June 26, 1998).* We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the district court’s Order is marked as “filed” on June 19, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on June 26, 1998. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray,

806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35

(4th Cir. 1986).

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished