Romey v. Vanyur
Romey v. Vanyur
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7030
LINUS ROMEY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
J. VANYUR, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-97-657-5-BR)
Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 6, 1999
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Linus Romey, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Linus Romey appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his
28 U.S.C. § 2241(1994) petition. We have reviewed the rec-
ord and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Romey v.
Vanyur, No. CA-97-657-5-BR (E.D.N.C. May 26, 1998). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished