Robinson v. Howard Co Pol Dept
Robinson v. Howard Co Pol Dept
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7156
TOMMY RAY ROBINSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HOWARD COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; POLICE CHIEF; KELLY SMITH, Officer; RICHARD RUTLEDGE, Offi- cer; M. T. HARDING, Officer; MICHAEL PRICE, Officer; UNIDENTIFIED MD STATE TROOPER; V. WILLIAM, Officer,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
THOMAS M. MARTIN, Detective; RICHARD WITTE, Detective; NORMAN SNYDER, Detective; K-9 DINO; MICHAEL MARTIN, Officer; SUSAN REIDER, Offi- cer; VICTORIA PLANK, Officer; KEITH FISHER, Officer, WILLIAM SEIFERT, Officer; NATHAN RETTIG, Officer,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-94- 393-AMD)
Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 6, 1999 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tommy Ray Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara McFaul Cook, County Solicitor, Rebecca Ann Laws, COUNTY SOLICITOR’S OFFICE, Ellicott City, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Tommy Ray Robinson appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 1998) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Robinson v. Howard County Police Dep’t,
No. CA-94-393-AMD (D. Md. July 13, 1998). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished