Legg v. O'Neil

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Legg v. O'Neil

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7099

WILLIAM ALLEN LEGG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN O’NEIL; ASSISTANT WARDEN PETERSON; MAJOR ALEO; LIEUTENANT KITZ; LIEUTENANT MEESE (Female); GEORGE HOLDORF, Correctional Offi- cer; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ROBERTS; CORRECTION- AL OFFICER MCCLOUD; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FLEMING; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MASON; CORREC- TIONAL OFFICER JAMES (Female), others to be listed thru discovery,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 98-896-DKC)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 6, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Allen Legg, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

William Allen Legg appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion for copies of pleadings at Government expense. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Legg v. O’Neil, No. CA-98-896-DKC (D. Md. May 5,

1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished