Legg v. O'Neil
Legg v. O'Neil
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7099
WILLIAM ALLEN LEGG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
WARDEN O’NEIL; ASSISTANT WARDEN PETERSON; MAJOR ALEO; LIEUTENANT KITZ; LIEUTENANT MEESE (Female); GEORGE HOLDORF, Correctional Offi- cer; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ROBERTS; CORRECTION- AL OFFICER MCCLOUD; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FLEMING; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MASON; CORREC- TIONAL OFFICER JAMES (Female), others to be listed thru discovery, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 98-896-DKC)
Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 6, 1999
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Allen Legg, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: William Allen Legg appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for copies of pleadings at Government expense. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Legg v. O’Neil, No. CA-98-896-DKC (D. Md. May 5, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.