U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Headley v. Shupe

Headley v. Shupe
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 6, 1999

Headley v. Shupe

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7063

FEDERICO J. HEADLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

MICHAEL A. SHUPE, Corrections Institution Operation Officer of Buckingham Correctional Center; MAEBELLE HOLMAN-BROWN, Postal Assis- tant of Buckingham Correctional Center, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-96-936-R)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 6, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Federico J. Headley, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Federico J. Headley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Headley v. Shupe, No. CA-96-936-R (W.D. Va. July 7, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.