Woodson v. City of Charleston
Woodson v. City of Charleston
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6887
GEORGE WINFRED WOODSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CITY OF CHARLESTON’S METRO DRUG UNIT (MDENT); KANAWHA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT AND DRUG ENFORCEMENT UNIT (DEU), And while acting in their individual capacities Under Color of Law; ART ASHLEY, Former Sheriff; LARRY DOTSON, Captain (sic); BOONE; SPARKS; DEPUTY AKERS; R. L. HARDIN, Deputy; BRIAN EUGENE JONES; MIKE WALKER; JAMES A. KING, Metro Drug Agent; STEVE NEDDO, Detective; SERGEANT NELSON, West Vir- ginia State Police; KERRY MCCLANAHAN; TINA LOUISE MCCLANAHAN HAMMONS, Confidential In- formants,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-229-2)
Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 5, 1999
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Winfred Woodson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
George W. Woodson appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 1998) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Woodson v. City of Charleston’s Metro Drug Unit, No. CA-98-229-2
(S.D.W. Va. June 4, 1998). We deny Woodson’s motions for appoint-
ment of counsel and extension of time to perfect his appeal. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished