United States v. Trevino
United States v. Trevino
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6969
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CARLOS TREVINO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CR-94-78-F, CA-98-295-F)
Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 5, 1999
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carlos Trevino, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolph A. Renfer, Jr., Assis- tant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Carlos Trevino seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 &
Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-
tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
of the district court. We also deny Trevino’s motion for reconsid-
eration. See United States v. Trevino, Nos. CR-94-78-F; CA-98-295-
F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished