United States v. Trevino

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Trevino

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6969

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CARLOS TREVINO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CR-94-78-F, CA-98-295-F)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 5, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlos Trevino, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolph A. Renfer, Jr., Assis- tant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Carlos Trevino seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. We also deny Trevino’s motion for reconsid-

eration. See United States v. Trevino, Nos. CR-94-78-F; CA-98-295-

F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished