U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Trevino

United States v. Trevino
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 5, 1999

United States v. Trevino

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6969

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

CARLOS TREVINO, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CR-94-78-F, CA-98-295-F)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 5, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlos Trevino, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolph A. Renfer, Jr., Assis- tant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Carlos Trevino seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. We also deny Trevino’s motion for reconsid- eration. See United States v. Trevino, Nos. CR-94-78-F; CA-98-295- F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.