United States v. Beavers
United States v. Beavers
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7129
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
ARMON O’NEAL BEAVERS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Abingdon. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-92-46, CA-97-815-R)
Submitted: December 15, 1998 Decided: January 5, 1999
Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Armon O’Neal Beavers, Appellant Pro Se. Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. United States v. Beavers, Nos. CR-92-46; CA-97-815-R (W.D. Va. July 21, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.