UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6165

RONALD B. MCINNIS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

KEITH MCLEAN, Administrator, GCDC; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLES CONDON, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. C. Weston Houck, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-3483-3-12-BC)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 5, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald B. McInnis, Appellant Pro Se. Lauri J. Soles, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Ronald B. McInnis appeals from the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1), in which he sought to vacate the court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Anti- terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McInnis v. McLean, No. CA-95-3483-3-12-BC (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 1998). We deny McInnis’ motions for relief based on new evidence and for pro- duction of documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED