U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

King v. Sellers

King v. Sellers
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 5, 1999

King v. Sellers

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6706

RANDY M. KING, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

HOPE SELLERS, Nurse; DEBORAH WILLIAMS; DEBORAH BURLESON, Nurse; GREGORY Q. THOMPSON, Lieu- tenant, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-97-188-3-MU)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 5, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randy M. King, Appellant Pro Se. William McBlief, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Randy M. King appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See King v. Sellers, No. CA-97-188-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Apr. 29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.