U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Platshorn v. Hahn

Platshorn v. Hahn
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 15, 1999

Platshorn v. Hahn

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6115

ROBERT E. PLATSHORN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

JOHN HAHN, Warden, FCI, Petersburg; UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-449)

Submitted: December 30, 1998 Decided: January 15, 1999

Before WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Peter Buscemi, MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, Washington, D.C., for Ap- pellant. Debra Jean Prillaman, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Robert E. Platshorn appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recom- mendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Platshorn v. Hahn, No. CA-96-449 (E.D. Va. Dec. 1, 1997). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.