Flores v. NC Attorney General
Flores v. NC Attorney General
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7533
OBALDO LAINEZ FLORES,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; NORTH CARO- LINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Paul Trevor Sharp, Magistrate Judge. (CA-98-371-1)
Submitted: December 29, 1998 Decided: January 15, 1999
Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Obaldo Lainez Flores, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Obaldo Lainez Flores seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of
appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
district court. See Flores v. North Carolina Atty Gen, No. CA-98-
371-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 1998). See also Brown v. Angelone,
150 F.3d 370, 375-76(4th Cir. 1998). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished