United States v. Jordan
United States v. Jordan
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7182
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM J. JORDAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 98-7183
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM J. JORDAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-88-391, CR-89-117)
Submitted: December 15, 1998 Decided: January 13, 1999 Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William J. Jordan, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hayden Bickerton, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying
his motions filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp.
1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-
icate of appealability and dismiss these appeals on the reasoning
of the district court. United States v. Jordan, Nos. CR-88-391;
CR-89-117 (D.S.C. July 29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished