Neal v. Beardsley
Neal v. Beardsley
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7527
LORENO NEAL,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
RALPH S. BEARDSLEY, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-97-1891-3-23BC)
Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 12, 1999
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Loreno Neal, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Loreno Neal seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying
relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 &
Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. See Neal v. Beardsley, No. CA-97-1891-3-23BC (D.S.C.
Sept. 28, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished