Hunter v. Patel

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Hunter v. Patel

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7507

MICHAEL ANTHONY HUNTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

P. R. PATEL, Doctor; M. K. GALLOWAY, IGC; ROBERT E. WARD, Warden; GEORGE MARTIN, Region- al Director; S. HUNTER RENTZ, Deputy Director,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. C. Weston Houck, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-2891-O-12BD)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 12, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Anthony Hunter, Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr., Columbia, South Carolina; Andrew Foster McLeod, HARRIS & MCLEOD, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Michael Anthony Hunter appeals the district court’s order de-

nying relief on his

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 1998) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no re-

versible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Hunter v. Patel, No. CA-97-2891-0-12BD (D.S.C.

Sept. 22, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished