Hunter v. Patel
Hunter v. Patel
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7507
MICHAEL ANTHONY HUNTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
P. R. PATEL, Doctor; M. K. GALLOWAY, IGC; ROBERT E. WARD, Warden; GEORGE MARTIN, Region- al Director; S. HUNTER RENTZ, Deputy Director, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. C. Weston Houck, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-2891-O-12BD)
Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 12, 1999
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Anthony Hunter, Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr., Columbia, South Carolina; Andrew Foster McLeod, HARRIS & MCLEOD, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Michael Anthony Hunter appeals the district court’s order de- nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no re- versible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hunter v. Patel, No. CA-97-2891-0-12BD (D.S.C. Sept. 22, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.