United States v. Strong
United States v. Strong
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7042
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LEE HARRIS STRONG,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR-96-15, CA-98-113-0-17)
Submitted: December 15, 1998 Decided: January 11, 1999
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lee Harris Strong, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Lee Harris Strong seeks to appeal the district court’s order
dismissing his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 &
Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-
tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal because we find
that Strong received constitutionally effective assistance of coun-
sel. See Strickland v. Washington,
466 U.S. 668, 687-94(1984).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished