U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Strong

United States v. Strong
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 11, 1999

United States v. Strong

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7042

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

LEE HARRIS STRONG, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR-96-15, CA-98-113-0-17)

Submitted: December 15, 1998 Decided: January 11, 1999

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lee Harris Strong, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Lee Harris Strong seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal because we find that Strong received constitutionally effective assistance of coun- sel. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-94 (1984).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.