Lawrence v. Moats

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Lawrence v. Moats

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7284

GEORGE LEE LAWRENCE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD F. MOATS; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 97-1219-PJM)

Submitted: December 15, 1998 Decided: January 11, 1999

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Lee Lawrence, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. Lawrence v. Moats, No. CA-97-1219-PJM (D. Md. Aug.

18, 1998). We also find that the bench conference from which

Appellant was excluded was not a stage of the proceedings during

which his presence was constitutionally required. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished