Hunt v. Britt
Hunt v. Britt
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7455
CHARLES BENNIE HUNT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOE FREEMAN BRITT; J. TOWNSEND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-562-5-CT-BO)
Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 11, 1999
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Bennie Hunt, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Charles Bennie Hunt appeals the district court’s orders deny-
ing relief on his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 1998) complaint
and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Hunt v. Britt, No. CA-98-562-5-CT-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 14
& Sept. 15, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished