White v. Rhinehart

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

White v. Rhinehart

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7082

JUDSON WARREN WHITE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FRED MARSHALL, Chief of Police; BRAD RHINE- HART, Officer; ERROLL RANDLE, Officer; CITY OF CHARLESTON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-213-2)

Submitted: January 5, 1999 Decided: January 21, 1999

Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Judson Warren White, Appellant Pro Se. John R. Teare, Jr., BOWLES, RICE, MCDAVID, GRAFF & LOVE, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Judson Warren White appeals the district court’s orders deny-

ing relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) complaint and denying his

motion for clarification. We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinions accepting the magistrate judge’s recom-

mendations and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See White v. Rhinehart, No.

CA-97-213-2 (S.D.W. Va. June 9, July 28 & Aug. 1, 1997). We deny

White’s motions for appointment of counsel and for leave to file

additional exhibits as evidence. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished