White v. Rhinehart
White v. Rhinehart
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7082
JUDSON WARREN WHITE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
FRED MARSHALL, Chief of Police; BRAD RHINE- HART, Officer; ERROLL RANDLE, Officer; CITY OF CHARLESTON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-213-2)
Submitted: January 5, 1999 Decided: January 21, 1999
Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Judson Warren White, Appellant Pro Se. John R. Teare, Jr., BOWLES, RICE, MCDAVID, GRAFF & LOVE, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Judson Warren White appeals the district court’s orders deny-
ing relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaint and denying his
motion for clarification. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinions accepting the magistrate judge’s recom-
mendations and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See White v. Rhinehart, No.
CA-97-213-2 (S.D.W. Va. June 9, July 28 & Aug. 1, 1997). We deny
White’s motions for appointment of counsel and for leave to file
additional exhibits as evidence. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished