White v. Rhinehart
White v. Rhinehart
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7082
JUDSON WARREN WHITE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
FRED MARSHALL, Chief of Police; BRAD RHINE- HART, Officer; ERROLL RANDLE, Officer; CITY OF CHARLESTON, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-213-2)
Submitted: January 5, 1999 Decided: January 21, 1999
Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Judson Warren White, Appellant Pro Se. John R. Teare, Jr., BOWLES, RICE, MCDAVID, GRAFF & LOVE, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Judson Warren White appeals the district court’s orders deny- ing relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and denying his motion for clarification. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions accepting the magistrate judge’s recom- mendations and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See White v. Rhinehart, No. CA-97-213-2 (S.D.W. Va. June 9, July 28 & Aug. 1, 1997). We deny White’s motions for appointment of counsel and for leave to file additional exhibits as evidence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.