McElhaney v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

McElhaney v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7661

ROBERT MCELHANEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JANET RENO, U. S. Attorney General,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-83-3, CR-92-22)

Submitted: January 7, 1999 Decided: January 21, 1999

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert McElhaney, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Robert McElhaney appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

28 U.S.C. § 2241

(1994) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See McElhaney v. United States, Nos. CA-98-83-3; CR-92-22

(S.D.W. Va. Sept. 25, 1998). We dispense with oral argument be-

cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished