McElhaney v. United States
McElhaney v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7661
ROBERT MCELHANEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JANET RENO, U. S.
Attorney General, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-83-3, CR-92-22)
Submitted: January 7, 1999 Decided: January 21, 1999
Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert McElhaney, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Robert McElhaney appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McElhaney v. United States, Nos. CA-98-83-3; CR-92-22 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 25, 1998). We dispense with oral argument be- cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.