Biles v. Smith
Biles v. Smith
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6826
ROBERT DAVID BILES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM L. SMITH, Warden; TRENT MILES, Of- ficer; SERGEANT POWELL; ERIC WAYNE YELITY, Sergeant; R. TANNER, Officer; OFFICER GANT; OFFICER FOUNTAIN; SERGEANT PERKINS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-94-1120-WMN)
Submitted: November 30, 1998 Decided: January 21, 1999
Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert David Biles, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., At- torney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Robert David Biles appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 1998) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Biles v. Smith, No. CA-94-1120-WMN (D. Md. May 28, 1998).* We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Although the district court’s judgment is marked as “filed” on May 27, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on May 28, 1998. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, we take the date that the judgment was physically entered on the docket sheet as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray,
806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35(4th Cir. 1986).
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished